JIGNESH SUKHDEVBHAI PATEL L/H OF SUKHDEV PATEL,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2(3)(6), SURAT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 128/SRT/2023Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 February 2025AY 2012-13Bench: SHRI PAWAN SINGH (Judicial Member), SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment was based on fresh tangible material and dismissed the assessee's additional grounds challenging it. Regarding the addition under Section 50C, the Tribunal directed the AO to take the average of the fair market values estimated in the first and second DVO reports.

What were the facts?

The assessee's assessment was reopened based on information from a survey in another case, suggesting undisclosed capital gains from land sale. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition under Section 50C, disputing the sale consideration and relying on the Stamp Valuation Authority's value.

What were the issues?

Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was valid, and how the fair market value for capital gains computation under Section 50C should be determined when multiple valuation reports exist.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 148,Section 50C,Section 142A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant  ��थ�/ The Respondent   आयकर आयु�/ CIT िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, सूरत/ DR, ITAT, SURAT  गाड� फाईल/ Guard File 

By order/आदेश से,

सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, सूरत

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →