SHOBHA DEVI,PATNA vs. NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 395/PAT/2024Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 June 2025AY 2016-17Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. However, as the assessee himself sought to withdraw the appeal and no objection was raised by the Revenue, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for assessment year 2016-2017. The appeal was filed belatedly by 36 days, for which a condonation of delay application was filed and accepted. Subsequently, the assessee filed an application for withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn upon the assessee's request.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

IT Act, Section not specified

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “PATNA BENCH”, PATNA

Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA

Hearing: 16/06/2025Pronounced: 16/06/2025

O R D E R

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →