GJANAHATA FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS MUMBAI, PEDDER ROAD MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the AR's application for withdrawal and noted that the Departmental Representative (DR) had no objection. The Tribunal allowed the appeal to be withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(E) rejecting their application for registration under Section 12A. The assessee's Authorized Representative (AR) requested to withdraw the appeal as a fresh application for registration under Section 12AB had been filed.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn based on a fresh application for registration filed by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI JAGADISH
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)[hereinafter ‘CIT (E)’]dated 22.05.2025 rejecting the registration under Section 12A.
The ld. Authorised Representative (AR) at the outset has submitted that assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal as it has made a fresh application before the ld. CIT (E) for registration under section 12A. The Ld. AR, therefore requested to allow the appeal to be withdrawn.
The ld. Departmental Representative (DR) did not object the withdrawal of appeal.
Gjanahata Foundation, Mumbai 4. We have considered the application made by Ld. AR and material available on record. The assessee has filled appeal against the order of Ld. CIT (E ), rejecting the application made in Form 10AB , seeking registration under section 12AB. The Ld AR has submitted that the assessee has made fresh application before the CIT (E) for registration under Section 12AB, in view of CBDT Circular dated 17.04.2025and therefore, wish to withdraw the appeal. The Ld DR has no objection to it.
We, accordingly, allow the appeal by assessee to be withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 14th day of January, 2026 at Mumbai.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026