ANISHA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,PATNA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the issue was a technical default and the assessee had already obtained registration under section 12A, the matter should be restored to the file of the CIT(E). The CIT(E) was directed to grant the assessee an adequate opportunity to rectify the mistakes in their application for 80G recognition.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(Exemption), Patna, which denied the benefit of recognition under section 80G of the Act. The denial was based on the ground that the assessee had filed the wrong form. The assessee acknowledged this as a technical default, having already secured registration under section 12A of the Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of 80G recognition for filing a wrong form is justified, or if the assessee should be allowed to rectify the defect.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “PATNA BENCH”, PATNA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
(नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2025-2026) Anishal Charitable Foundation Vs CIT(Exemtpion), Patna 402, Niharika Apartment, Bailey Road, Sheikhpura, Patna PAN No. :AAVCA 8490 L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Aman Raja, AR राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Rajat Datta, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 26/06/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 30/06/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Id. CIT(Exemption), Patna, dated 26.12.2024, passed in DIN & Order No.ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1071595945(1) for the assessment year 2025-2026, denying the assessee the benefit of recognition u/s.80G of the Act.
It was submitted by the ld. AR that the ld. CIT€ has denied the recognition u/s.80G of the Act on the ground that the assessee has filed wrong form. It was the submission that the assessee has been granted permanent registration u/s.12A of the Act. It was the prayer that the issue may be restored to the file of the ld. CIT(E) with liberty to assessee to rectify the mistakes/defects in the application for the recognition u/s.80G of the Act.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026