Facts
The assessee, a Charitable Trust, filed an application for approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(E) rejected the application, not on the grounds of 80G approval, but by holding that registration under Section 12AB of the Act could not be granted as the trust had violated Section 11 of the Act by intending to apply funds outside India.
Held
The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) had misdirected himself by rejecting the assessee's registration under Section 12AB when the application was for approval under Section 80G. This was beyond the jurisdiction of the CIT(E) for the purpose of the current application.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(E) exceeded his jurisdiction by rejecting an application for 80G approval on grounds related to Section 12AB registration.
Sections Cited
80G, 12AB, 11
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI JAGADISHSmt. Gangaben Parshottam Parikh
Per Saktijit Dey, Vice President:
This is an appeal by the assessee against an order dated 28.09.2025 passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) [in short the ‘CIT(E)’], Mumbai rejecting assessee’s application seeking approval under Section (u/s.) 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’).
Briefly the facts are, the assessee is a Charitable Trust filed an application in Form-10AB on 28.02.2025 seeking approval u/s. 80G of the Act before learned CIT(E). After verifying the application of the assessee, learned CIT(E) called upon the assessee to furnish various details and justify the request for approval. Ultimately, by the impugned order, learned CIT(E) rejected assessee’s application holding that registration u/s. 12AB of the Act cannot be granted to the assessee as it has violated the conditions of Section 11 of the Act, since one of the objects of the assessee is to apply funds outside India.
We have heard the parties and perused the materials on record. It has been submitted on behalf of the assessee before us that the application filed was only for seeking approval u/s. 80G of the Act. It is the say of the assessee that it has already been granted registration u/s. 12AB of the Act till the end of AY 2026-27. On perusal of the impugned order of learned CIT(E), we find that in the opening paragraph of the order he has clearly mentioned that the application under consideration was an application seeking approval under Section 80G of the Act. However, learned CIT(E) has completely misdirected himself and proceeded to reject assessee’s registration u/s. 12AB of the Act which was not a subject matter of consideration before him. Therefore, in our considered opinion, learned CIT(E) has exceeded his jurisdiction in rejecting assessee’s registration u/s. 12AB of the Act while dealing with an application seeking approval u/s. 80G of the Act.
In view of aforesaid, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order of learned CIT(E) with a direction to consider assessee’s application seeking approval u/s. 80G of the Act on its own merits without venturing into the issue of validity of registration u/s. 12AB of the Act. Needless to mention, while deciding the issue learned CIT(E) must provide reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. He should also bear in mind that assessee was granted approval u/s. 80G of the Act till A.Y. 2024- 25.
In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.