Facts
The assessee filed a return declaring NIL income. During assessment under section 143(3), an addition was made under 'Income from Other Sources'. Subsequently, a penalty under section 270A was levied for underreporting income, which the assessee attributed to a bonafide clerical and typographical error in not punching the income from other sources into the ITR, despite it being considered in the computation of income.
Held
The Tribunal held that the omission of income in the return was due to a bonafide and inadvertent typographical mistake. Relying on Supreme Court judgments, it was concluded that such human errors do not constitute underreporting or misreporting of income warranting a penalty under Section 270A.
Key Issues
Whether penalty under Section 270A is leviable for income omission due to a bonafide clerical/typographical error, or if such an error negates 'underreporting' or 'misreporting'.
Sections Cited
270A, 143(3), 154
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
PER PRABHASH SHANKAR [A.Μ.] :- The present appeal arising from the appellate order dated 11.03.2025 is filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] pertaining to penalty order passed u/s. 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “Act