DCIT(CC)-8(3), MUMBAI vs. SHAPOORJI PALLONI AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue of determining the Arm's Length Price (ALP) for financial guarantees back to the TPO/Assessing Officer, following previous decisions in the assessee's own case. For performance guarantees, the Tribunal found that the assessee had an obligation to step in and indemnify the guarantee holder in case of the AE's failure, thus distinguishing it from prior cases.
What were the facts?
The assessee company issued performance and financial guarantees to its associated enterprises. The Assessing Officer treated these as international transactions and made transfer pricing adjustments for non-recovery of guarantee commission. The CIT(A) partly allowed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the issuance of performance and financial guarantees constitutes an international transaction, and if so, what is the arm's length price for the guarantee commission. Additionally, issues regarding deductibility of stamp duty expenses under Section 35DD and time-barring of assessment proceedings were raised.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 92B,Section 143(3),Section 144C(3),Section 35DD,Section 43B,Section 153
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Everest Kento Cylinders Ltd.304 citing378 ITR 57 · 2015 · HC
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H” BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.1149/MUM/2025 (Assessment Year: 2012-2013) (Assessment Year: 2013-2014)
Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited 1st Floor, 41/44, S. P. Centre, Minoo Desai Marg, Colaba, Mumbai - 400005. Maharashtra. [PAN:AAACS6994C] Income Tax, Central Circle – (3), Mumbai)
Room No.656, 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai - 400020. Maharashtra ITA No.1217/MUM/2025 (Assessment Year: 2012-2013) (Assessment Year: 2013-2014)
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3(3)(1), Mumbai Respondent (now transferred to Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – (3), Mumbai)
Room No.656, 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai - 400020. Maharashtra Vs Appellant Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited 1st Floor, 41/44, S. P. Centre, Minoo Desai Marg, Colaba, Mumbai - 400005.
Maharashtra. [PAN:AAACS6994C] Appearance For the Appellant/Assessee Shri Rajan Vora, Shri Nikhil Tiwari Ms. Palak Mehta For the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92B
- Flora Biochem Private Limited, Coimbatore vs DCIT, CoimbatoreITA 1123/CHNY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Satyam Venture Engineering Services Pvt… vs ACIT, Central Circle-3(2), HyderabadITTPA 12/HYD/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Satyam Venture Engineering Services Pvt… vs ACIT, Central Circle-3(2), HyderabadITTPA 11/HYD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Satyam Venture Engineering Services Pvt… vs ACIT, Central Circle-3(2), HyderabadITTPA 10/HYD/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Satyam Venture Engineering Services Private… vs ACIT, Central Circle-3(2), HyderabadITA 9/HYD/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026