Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Act for AY 2018-19. At the time of hearing, the assessee's counsel submitted that the assessee wished to withdraw the appeal.
Held
The assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the present appeal. The Tribunal considered the request for withdrawal.
Key Issues
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn upon request by the assessee's counsel.
Sections Cited
263
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH
PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL - JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This is an appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (in short “Ld. PCIT”), Surat-1, Surat under Section 263 of the Act vide order dated 06.03.2024 passed for A.Y. 2018-19.
At the time of hearing, the Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee wishes to withdraw the present appeal, since in the set-aside proceedings, the Assessing Officer did not make any addition to the returned income filed by the assessee.
In result, in light of the request of the Counsel for the assessee to withdraw the present appeal filed by the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced under proviso to Rule 34 of ITAT Rules, 1963 on 27/03/2025
Sd/- Sd/- (BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH) (SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 27/03/2025 TANMAY, Sr. PS TRUE COPY आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��थ� / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A)- िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, सूरत / DR, ITAT, Surat 5. 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,