MOHANLAL CHHAGANLAL KABRAWALA,BHARUCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

PDF
ITA 1317/SRT/2024Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 March 2025AY 2023-24Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee trust's application for final registration under section 12A of the Income Tax Act was rejected by the CIT(E) due to a mismatch in the trust's name on the PAN ID and the certificate from the Charity Commissioner. The appeal was filed 566 days late, but the delay was condoned as the assessee was unaware of the order.

Held

The Tribunal held that the reason for rejection by the CIT(E) was not justified, as there is no legal requirement for a charitable trust to be registered with the Charity Commissioner before obtaining 12A registration. The matter was restored to the CIT(E) to decide the application on merits.

Key Issues

Whether rejection of final registration under Section 12A is justified solely on the ground of name mismatch between PAN and Charity Commissioner's certificate?

Sections Cited

12A, 12AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Kamlesh Bhatt, A.R
For Respondent: Shri Aashish Pophare, CIT-D.R

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

The present appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(E)’] dated 28.03.2023 passed u/s. 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as “the Act”) relevant to the Assessment Year 2023-24. I.T.A No. 1317/Srt/2024 A.Y. 2023-24 Page No. 2

2.

The assessee in this appeal is aggrieved by the action of the ld. CIT(E) in rejecting the application of the assessee for final registration u/s. 12A of the Income Tax Act. The appeal is time barred by 566 days. Separate application for condonation of delay has been filed, wherein, it has been stated that the assessee was not aware of the passing of the impugned order of the CIT(E). That the order was uploaded on the income tax portal and not physically served and the assessee did not come to know about the same. Considering the above submissions, the delay in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.

3.

The ld. counsel has submitted that the final registration has been rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) solely for the reason that there was a mis-match in the name of the assessee trust as mentioned in the PAN ID as compared to the certificate granted by the Charity Commissioner of the State Government. We note that the above said reason given by the CIT(E) is not justified. There is no requirement under law that charitable trust must be registered with the Charitable Commissioner before getting registration u/s. 12A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee trust has already been granted provisional registration u/s. 12A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee in this respect has filed Form No. 10AC issued by the CIT(E) dated 12-03-2022 under the name of the assessee trust

I.T.A No. 1317/Srt/2024 A.Y. 2023-24 Page No. 3 CIT(E) was supposed to examine the activities and decide the case of the assessee on merits. Therefore, the rejection of the application for final registration is not justified. Accordingly, the impugned order of the CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored back to the file of CIT(E) to decide the application of the assessee for final registration on merits as per provisions of the section 12A r.w.s. 12AB of the Income Tax Act. If the assessee satisfies relevant conditions laid down in the relevant provisions then registration would not be denied on the ground that there is a mis-match in the name of the assessee as registered with the State Charitable Commissioner. Ld. counsel has also stated on behalf of the assessee that the assessee will move an application for correction in the name of the assessee in the PAN or with the Charity Commissioner to avoid any confusion at a later stage. It is directed that the assessee will do the needful accordingly.

4.

With the above observations, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 28-03-2025 (BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH) (SANJAY GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad : Dated: 28/03/2025

I.T.A No. 1317/Srt/2024 A.Y. 2023-24 Page No. 4 आदेश क" ""त"ल"प अ"े"षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:-

1.

Assessee

2.

Revenue

3.

Concerned CIT

4.

CIT (A)

5.

DR, ITAT, Surat

6.

Guard file. By order, ////

MOHANLAL CHHAGANLAL KABRAWALA,BHARUCH vs CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD | BharatTax