MEGHNA ASHISH VASHI,NA vs. ARIVS.ITO, WARD 3, NAVSARI, NAVSARI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay of 7 days in filing the appeal before the CIT(A). The matter was restored to the file of the CIT(A) with a direction to decide the appeal afresh on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) which was dismissed in limine due to a delay of 7 days. The assessee's counsel argued that the delay was due to the requirement of digital signatures for online filing. The Departmental Representative relied on the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay of 7 days in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned to allow the assessee to present the case on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth
Date of hearing : 05-03-2025 Date of pronouncement : 28-03-2025 आदेश/ORDER Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:-
The present appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)’] dated 11.10.2024 arising out of the assessment order passed u/s.147 r.w.s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as “the Act”) relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-13. Meghna Ashish Vashi, A.Y. 2012-13
At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine as there was a delay of 7 days in filing the appeal. The ld. counsel has submitted that as per the latest provisions of the Act, the appeal is to be filed online for which digital signatures of the assessee were required, due to that, small delay of 7 days has occurred in getting the digital signatures. He, therefore, has submitted that the minor delay of 7 days in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) may be condoned and the Ld. CIT(A) be directed to decide the appeal on merits. The ld. Departmental Representative on the other hand has relied on the order of the Ld. CIT(A)
Considering the rival submissions, in our view, the interests of justice will be well served if the assessee is given an opportunity to present her case before the ld. CIT(A). Therefore, the delay of 7 days in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) is hereby condoned and the matter is restored to the file of CIT(A) with a direction to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026