ATLANTIS IT SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY.CIT, CIRCLE 6(1)(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged the ground realities regarding an octogenarian's familiarity with electronic communication. It held that in such circumstances, an ex parte order cannot be sustained due to violation of principles of natural justice, and the matter should be decided afresh after providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) without proper adjudication of issues on merits. The assessee contended that due to the age and lack of familiarity with electronic communication of its management, it could not properly access or respond to notices.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex parte order by the CIT(A) is sustainable when the assessee could not be represented due to genuine constraints related to electronic communication and age.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR
आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 19.11.2024 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, for the quantum of reassessment framed under section 147 read with section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2016-17.
The only grievance of the assessee is against the ex parte disposal of the appeal by the learned CIT(A), without
Atlantis IT Solution Pvt. Ltd., adjudicating the issues on merits and without affording any effective opportunity of being heard. It has been submitted that the assessee company is managed by a person who is aged 81 years, an octogenarian, who is not conversant with electronic modes of communication or the ITBA portal and, therefore, could not properly access or respond to the notices issued by the learned CIT(A). On account of such genuine constraints, the assessee remained unrepresented before the first appellate authority and could not place its case.
The learned Senior Departmental Representative relied upon the orders of the authorities below.
We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record. Although notices are issued through email and the ITBA portal, yet one cannot be oblivious to the ground realities that where an assessee is managed by an octogenarian, who is not conversant with electronic modes of communication, it can reasonably be said to constitute sufficient cause for not being able to respond to such notices or attend the proceedings. In these facts and in view of the principles of natural justice, such an ex parte order cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside. Accordingly, the matter is restored back to the file of the learned CIT(A) to be decided afresh in accordance with law, after affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee shall ensure that notices sent through electronic mode, email or the ITBA portal are
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 29th January, 2026.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026