MAYUR THAKORBHAI CHAMPANERIYA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(3), SURAT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1049/SRT/2024Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 April 2025AY 2009-10Bench: SHRI SANJAY GARG (Judicial Member), SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as their application under the Vivad se Visvas scheme was accepted. The revenue had no objection to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre. The assessee had applied for the benefits of the Direct Vivad se Visvas Scheme -2024 and this application was accepted.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn consequent to the acceptance of the assessee's application under the Vivad se Visvas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH

Hearing: 19/03/2025Pronounced: 16/04/2025

O R D E R

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →