Facts
The Revenue preferred appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) which pertained to assessment orders for AYs 2016-17 and 2018-19. The issues in both appeals were common and interlinked. The appeals involved disallowance of deduction under Section 80IC, disallowance of depreciation, and disallowance of bogus purchases.
Held
The Tribunal held that the disallowance of deduction under Section 80IC and depreciation could not be sustained based on previous ITAT orders. Regarding bogus purchases, the ITAT had restricted the addition to 12%. The Tribunal also held that the delay in filing the return of income was a procedural irregularity and not a fundamental flaw, thus allowing the deduction under Section 80IC.
Key Issues
Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 80IC, depreciation, and bogus expenses were justified. Whether the claim for deduction under Section 80IC should be disallowed due to delayed filing of the return.
Sections Cited
Sec 143(3), Sec 80IC, Sec 69C, Sec 133A, Sec 80IB, Sec 139, Sec 80AC, Sec 44AB, Sec 32, Sec 115JB, Sec 145(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
आदेश की प्रयियलयि अग्रेयिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. विभागीय प्रविविवि, आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file.
P a g e | 19 ITA No. 6857 & 6858/Mum/2025 A.Y. 2016-17 & 2018-19 Time Technoplast Ltd., Mumbai सत्यावपि प्रवि //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उि/सहायक िंजीकार (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अिीलीय अयिकरण/ ITAT, Bench, Mumbai.