OCEAN DIVING CENTRE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASST. COMM. OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of corporate guarantee to the DRP for adjudication due to pending rectification petitions. The charging of interest on a loan to an Associated Enterprise was upheld, citing the loss of opportunity to earn interest and established legal principles. The issue of disputed customs duty was remitted to the AO/TPO for verification of the purpose of payment. The disallowance of written-off amounts as bad debt was also remitted to the TPO for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Ocean Diving Centre Limited, filed an appeal against the ACIT's order concerning the Assessment Year 2021-22. The appeal raised four primary issues: adjustment for Corporate Guarantee, adjustment for interest on a loan, payment of disputed customs duty, and disallowance of sundry balances written off.
What were the issues?
The appeal involved disputes over corporate guarantee commission, interest on a loan to an AE, deductibility of disputed customs duty, and allowability of written-off amounts as bad debts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Cotton Naturals (I) (P.) Ltd.273 citing55 Taxmann.com 523 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- UCB India (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT15 citing35 SOT 406 · 2010 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘J’ BENCH, MUMBAI
PER OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, AM: This appeal is filed by the appellant against the order of the ACIT, Central Circle-3(1) in DIN & Order No.ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2024- 25/1069766751(1) dated 18.10.2024 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) for the A.Y.2021-22. 2 Ocean Diving Centre Limited
The appellant company filed an appeal before ITAT on the following 4 issues :
a) DRP erred in upholding the adjustment of 0.5% on account
of Corporate Guarantee
b) DRP e
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026