ROHIT KUMAR DAS,KATIHAR vs. ITO , KATIHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay of 17 days in filing the appeal, being satisfied with the assessee's reasonable cause. The appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for readjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was time-barred by 17 days due to medical reasons, for which condonation was sought with supporting documentation. The impugned order had dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with a notice to substantiate a claim.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned? Whether the appeal should be restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
we reject the adjournment petition and proceed to decide the appeal exparte qua the assessee and after hearing ld CIT DR.
The appeal is time barred by 17 days. The assessee has filed condonation stating the reasons for filing the appeal late by 17 days supported by medical prescription. On consideration of the petition, we are satisfied that the assessee was prevented by reasonable cause for presenting the appeal within the stipulated time period. Even otherwise, the delay being only a short period, we condone the delay of 17 days and admit the appeal for adjudication.
We have heard ld ld CIT DR and perused the record of the case. A perusal of the impugned order clearly shows that the ld CIT (A) has dismissed the appeal for non-compliance of notice issued to substantiated the claim made by the assessee. However, on perusal of records also shows that the assessee is interested in pursuing his appeal. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the issues in this appeal are restored to the file of the ld CIT(A) for readjudication after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to cooperate in the set aside proceedings before the ld CIT(A) without fail. With these directions, the appeal is restored to the file of ld CIT(A).
P a g e 2 | 3
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026