BAJAJ INTERNATIONAL REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, 1(2)1, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue related to Section 43CA additions to the Assessing Officer for adjudication, considering additional evidence. Grounds related to disallowance under Section 14A and adjustment for book profit under Section 115JB were allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Bajaj International Reality Private Limited, filed appeals against orders upholding additions made under Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act. The dispute involved the applicability of Section 43CA to property bookings made prior to its insertion and the method of revenue recognition.
What were the issues?
Whether Section 43CA is applicable to transactions prior to its insertion and whether revenue recognition under POCM affects its applicability. Also, the applicability of Section 14A disallowance and adjustments to book profit under Section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.789 citing165 ITR 27 · 2017 · HC
- Sulochana Saijan Modi v. Income Tax Officer8 citing152 Taxmann.com 56 · 2023
- Kolte Patil Developers ltd vs DCIT (2024)( 167 (i) Kolte Patil Developers ltd. v. DCIT4 citing167 Taxmann.com 385 · 2024
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM
These two appeals by the assessee are directed against two separate orders, both dated 16.06.2025, passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for Assessment Year (in short A.Y) 2016 -17 and 2018 -19 respectively. As common issue in dispute
Bajaj International Reality Bajaj International Reality 2 Private Limited ITA Nos. 5321 and 5319 5321 and 5319/MUM/2025
is involved in these appeals and therefore sa n these appeals and therefore same w
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43CA
- Ladam Homes Private Limited, Thane vs ACIT, Circle 1, ThaneITA 5788/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- M/S Suraj & Associates, Mumbai vs ACIT 31(3) / Now ACIT 41(4)(1), MumbaiITA 408/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Dy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Susneh Infrapark Private Limited, MumbaiITA 9262/MUM/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Dy Commissioner of Income Tax Central… vs Sushneh Infrapark Private Limited, MumbaiITA 9261/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Dy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Susneh Infrapark Private Limited, MumbaiITA 9260/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026