No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH
आदेश / O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, Judicial Member:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Visakhapatnam vide Appeal
No.440/2014-15 dated 16.6.2017 for the assessment year 2011-12.
Facts are in brief that the assessee is an individual carrying on
business in purchase and sale of Indian Made foreign Liquor (IMFL) in
ITA No.478 /Vizag/2017 K. Satyanarayana, Vizianagaram Vizianagaram District. He filed return of income by declaring total
income of ` 4,47,820/-. The return filed by the assessee was processed
u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as 'the Act')
and thereafter, after following the due procedure, assessment is
completed u/s 143(3) of the Act. In the assessment order, the A.O.
noted that the assessee has made payments towards initial license fee,
first purchase of stock and FDR towards bank guarantee during the
months of June, 2010 and July, 2010 amounting to ` 15,78,729/-. The
capital contribution of the assessee as shown in the balance sheet filed
during the course of assessment proceedings is of ` 17,15,000/-. The
assessee tried to explain the source of capital of the assessee for
making payment of initial license fee, etc. before commencement of the
sale of new wine shop the then available funds representing his capital
and quasi capital from relatives and friends. But he failed to furnish any
documentary evidence regarding the then available funds representing
this capital, quasi capital from friends and relatives. Accordingly, the
capital contribution of the assessee treated as out of unexplained
sources and added income from other sources. Accordingly, he made
an addition of ` 17,15,000/- brought to tax under the head “income
from other sources”. On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) directed the A.O. to
ITA No.478 /Vizag/2017 K. Satyanarayana, Vizianagaram verify the ITR of the assessee for the year 2009-10, if any capital is
available credit may be given to the assessee.
On being aggrieved, assessee carried matter in appeal before the
Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee strongly relied on the
grounds of appeal.
On the other hand, the Ld. D.R. relied on the orders of the A.O.
We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available
on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. In this
case, the assessee has introduced a capital of ` 17,15,000/-. When the
A.O. has asked the assessee, it was submitted that the capital
introduced by him in the IMFL business is his own capital and also
borrowed from his relatives and friends. However, no details were filed
before the A.O. Therefore, the A.O. treated the entire capital introduced
by him of ` 17,15,000/- as unexplained source and brought to tax under
the head “income from other sources”. On appeal before the CIT(A), it
was submitted that the assessee is having own capital, therefore, the
same may be considered and to that extent set off may be given. The
Ld. CIT(A) by considering explanation given by the assessee, he directed
the A.O. as under:
ITA No.478 /Vizag/2017 K. Satyanarayana, Vizianagaram “AO is directed to verify the ITR of the assessee for AY 2009-10, whether any balance sheet was also filed along with that ITR and in that balance sheet if the capital account as on 30.3.2009 reflects any capital, the same may be given credit. This direction is given in line with assessee’s submissions before AO (refer para 2 of page 5 of the asst. order), and also going the fact that the same AO has given credit to the b/f capital in other IMFL cases.” 6. In view of the direction given by the CIT(A), we find that the Ld.
CIT(A)’s direction is as requested by the Ld. A.R. of the assessee and
therefore, we find no further direction can be given in this case.
Accordingly, this appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
The above order was pronounced in the open court on 6th Apr’18.
Sd/- Sd/- ( ड.एस. . . . सु�दर "संह) (वी. दुगा�राव) (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �या�यक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER #वशाखापटणम /Visakhapatnam: 'दनांक /Dated : 06.04.2018 VG/SPS आदेश क� ��त)ल#प अ*े#षत/Copy of the order forwarded to:-
अपीलाथ� / The Appellant – Killari Satyanarayana, Prop. Mahalaxmi Wines, Main
Road, Biyyalapeta, Vizianagaram 2. ��याथ� / The Respondent – The ITO, Ward-2, Lower Tankbund Road, Siddarth
Nagar, Balaji Nagar, Vizianagaram. 3. आयकर आयु+त / The Principal CIT-1, Visakhapatnam
ITA No.478 /Vizag/2017 K. Satyanarayana, Vizianagaram
आयकर आयु+त (अपील) / The CIT (A)-1, Visakhapatnam
#वभागीय ��त�न.ध, आय कर अपील�य अ.धकरण, #वशाखापटणम /
DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam
गाड� फ़ाईल / Guard file
आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER // True Copy //
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM