DELOITTE SHARED SERVICES INDIA LLP (SUCCESSOR OF DELOITTE SHARED SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE - 1(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee owned the e-devices and they were allotted to group entities before the end of the financial year, and user charges were recovered and offered to tax, the 'put to use' condition is met. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to depreciation.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed depreciation on e-devices which were purchased and allotted to group companies for their use. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowed the depreciation on the grounds that the devices were not used for the assessee's own business.
What were the issues?
Whether depreciation can be claimed on assets owned by the assessee but used by group entities, when user charges are recovered and offered to tax.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Essan Investments Ltd.3 citing147 Taxmann 103 · 2005 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM
Per Arun Khodpia, AM: The captioned appeal of the assessee, preferred against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), dated 30.06.2025, arises from the order u/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”) dated 14.12.2017, passed by DCIT-1(1)(1), Mumbai (In short “Ld. AO”), has raised the following ground of appeal: Deloitte Shared Services India LLP
“1:0 Re.: Di
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Doms Industries Ltd, Valsad vs PCIT, ValsadITA 595/SRT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Aeon Formulations Private Limited, Chennai vs Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(1)…ITA 2481/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Fiitjee Limited, Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 9186/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Fiitjee Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 9185/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026