JSC OGCC KAZSTROY SERVICE PROJECT OFFICE,GURGAON vs. DCIT INTL. TAXATION, GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approval granted by the JCIT under Section 153D was mechanical and lacked application of mind, vitiating the assessment orders. Consequently, the penalty proceedings initiated based on these invalid assessment orders were also quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment orders were passed under Section 153A/143(3) following a search operation. The approval for these assessments under Section 153D was granted by the JCIT. The assessee challenged the validity of the assessment orders due to a lack of proper application of mind by the approving authority.
What were the issues?
Whether the approval granted by the JCIT under Section 153D was valid, and if not, whether it vitiates the assessment order and subsequent penalty proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Sapna Gupta591 citing2022 SCC OnLine ALL 1294 · 2023
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.580 citing2023 SCC OnLine ORI 992 · 2023 · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.500 citing163 Taxmann.com 118 · 2024 · SC
- Shreelekha Damani v. DCIT236 citing173 TTJ 332 · 2015 · ITAT
- Vijayadevi Naval Kishore Bharatia v. Land Acquisition Officer167 citing5 SCC 83 · 2003 · SC
- Gauhati in Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. v. Union of India154 citing366 ELT 253 · 2019 · HC
- Navin Jain v. DCIT41 citing91 ITR 682 · 2021 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “F” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM : The captioned appeals are filed by the assessee against the separate orders, all dated 15.02.2018 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-27, New Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)” in short] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] arising from the different assessment orders pertaining to Assessment Years 2014- 15 & 2015-16 and 2014-15 & 2015-16 respectively, which is tabulated as under:- Sl. ITA No.
Assessment CIT(A)’s AO’s order Assessment No.
Years order dated dated Order passed
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026