SURAT NETWORK,SURAT vs. PCIT, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
At the outset of the hearing, the assessee's counsel stated that as per his client's instructions, he wished to withdraw the present appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred an appeal against an order passed by the Ld.Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Surat, under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This order arose from an order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 147 r.w.s. 144 and 144B of the Act for the Assessment Year 2017-18.
What were the issues?
The appeal was filed against an order passed by the Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263. The assessee decided to withdraw the appeal during the hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SURAT” BENCH, SURAT
Before: S/SHRI SANJAY GARG & BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH
Assessment Year : 2017-18 Surat Network The Pr.Commissioner of 5/942-943/b-1, Chakawala Vs Income Tax-1 House Jada Khadi Surat. Mahidharpura, Surat 395 003 PAN : ABSFS 3431 L (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee by Shri P.M. Jagasheth, CA : Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT-DR Revenue by सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 18/06/2025 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement: 18/06/2025 आदेश/O R D E R
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member
The above appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order passed by the Ld.Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Surat [hereinafter referred to as “ld.Pr.CIT” dated 4.3.2024 in exercise of power under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) arising out of the order passed by the Assessing Officer, (in short “the AO”) under section 147 r.w.s. 144 and 144B of the Act pertaining to Assessment Year 2017-18.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Shivaraj M S vs. The Union Of INDIAKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026