RUDRA AUTOMOTIVES PVT. LTD.,MUZAFFARPUR vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, MUZAFFARPUR

PDF
ITA 423/PAT/2025Status: DisposedITAT Patna28 November 2025AY 2018-192 pages
AI SummaryN/A

Facts

The assessee appealed against an ex-parte order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) for AY 2018-19. The assessee's counsel requested the tribunal to restore the matter to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits, a request which was not opposed by the DR.

Held

The Tribunal held that the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) without deciding issues on merit violated Section 250(6) of the Act. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) with a direction to decide the appeal on merit after providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

Key Issues

Validity of an ex-parte order passed by CIT(A) without deciding on merits and whether the case should be remanded for a fresh decision.

Sections Cited

Section 250(6) of the Act

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “PATNA” BENCH, PATNA

Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VP & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM

Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 15.07.2025 for the AY 2018-19.

2.

The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the order was passed ex-parte by the learned CIT (A). The ld. Counsel for the assessee therefore prayed that the issue may kindly be restored to the file of the ld. CIT (A), so that issue could be decided on merit afresh.

2.1. The ld. DR on the other hand did not oppose the counsel of the assessee.

2.2. We after hearing the submission of the parties and perusing the material available on record, we find that apparently this appeal was decided ex-parte by the learned CIT (A). We note that despite

3.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 28.11.2025.

Sd/- Sd/- (DUVVURU RL REDDY) (RAJESH KUMAR) (VICE PRESIDENT) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Patna, Dated: 28.11.2025 Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT DR, ITAT, 4. 5. Guard file. BY ORDER, True Copy//

Sr. Private Secretary/ Asst. Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna

RUDRA AUTOMOTIVES PVT. LTD.,MUZAFFARPUR vs ASSESSMENT UNIT, MUZAFFARPUR | BharatTax