M/S SAMI LABS LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-6(1)(1), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee, having had their grievance settled by a subsequent order, chose not to press the appeal. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the DCIT. During the pendency of the appeal, the Revenue passed an order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, which resolved the assessee's grievance.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to a subsequent settlement of the assessee's grievance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENGALURU BENCH C, BENGALURU
Before: SHRI. A. K. GARODIA & SHRI. LALIET KUMAR
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH 'C', BENGALURU BEFORE SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI. LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T(TP).A No.2178/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) Sami labs Ltd, No.19/1 & 19/2, 1st Main, 2nd Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bengaluru 560058 .. Appellant PAN : AADCS2549E v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle – 6(1)(1), Bengaluru .. Respondent Assessee by : Shri. Cherian K Baby, CA Revenue by : Smt. Neera Malhothra, JCIT Heard on : 18.03.2019 Pronounced on : 22.03.2019 O R D E R
PER LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the DCIT, Circle -6(1)(1), Bengaluru, dt.07.01.2015, passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C of the Act, in pursuance to the directions of the DRP, for the assessment year 2010-11.
IT(TP)A.2178/Bang/2018 Page - 2
It was submitted by the Ld AR that recently the Revenue has passed an order u/s.154, whereby the grievance of the assessee has been settled. In view of the same, the assessee is not pressing the appeal and therefore sought to withdraw the appeal.
The Ld. DR had no objection if the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn.
In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026