SHRI YOGESH ROSHANLAL GUPTA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2(1)(4), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the 'Vivad se Vishwas' scheme. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted to avail the benefits of the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' and received a certificate from the Designated Authority. The Revenue representative had no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE- & SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR
आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘‘सी’’ अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD (through web-based video conferencing platform) ] ] BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Years : 2015-16 Yogesh Roshanlal Gupta, Income-Tax Officer, A-3, Sangath-3, Nr. Kalka Dham, Vs Ward 2(1)(4), Nr. Motera Stadium Road, Sabarmati, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad – 380005 PAN : ABKPG 1760 G अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Hardik Vora, Advocate Revenue by : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement: 02/03/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT :
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2, Ahmedabad dated 25th September 2018 passed for Assessment Year 2015-16.
We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties through video conferencing. Learned Counsel for the Assessee, at the outset, submitted that assessee has opted to avail the benefits of “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” and has received Certificate in Form No.3 from Designated Authority under Section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Copy of the Form No.3 is placed on record before the Tribunal in this regard.
The learned Departmental Representative submitted that he has no objection to the withdrawal of appeal in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee. Yogesh Roshanlal Gupta Vs. ITO AY : 2015-16 2
In view of the submissions made by the assessee before the Bench as also considering the fact that the assessee has already opted to avail scheme “Vivad se Vishwas”, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of Vivad se Vishwas Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 2nd March, 2022 at Ahmedabad. (T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR) VICE-PRESIDENT Ahmedabad, Dated 02/03/2022 *Bt
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026