No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri N.K. Pradhan
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-24, Mumbai, dated 05.06.2017, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Sec.143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’), dated 31.03.2015 for A.Y.2009-10. The ld. Authorized Representative (for short ‘A.R’) for the assessee at the very outset of the hearing of the appeal submitted, that as instructed, the assessee seeks to withdraw the present appeal. A letter dated 23.07.2019 requesting that the appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn had also been placed on record. The ld. Departmental Representative (for short ‘D.R’) did not P a g e | 2 ITA No. 5409/Mum/2017 AY. 2009-10 M/s Marathan IT Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer-15(2) object to the seeking of withdrawal of the aforesaid appeal by the assessee.
In the backdrop of the aforesaid concession on the part of the ld. A.R, we herein allow the withdrawal of the aforesaid appeal. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 23.07.2019 (N.K. Pradhan) (Ravish Sood) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER भ ुंफई Mumbai; ददन ुंक 23.07.2019 PS: Rohit आदेश की प्रतिलऱपि अग्रेपिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अऩीर थी / The Appellant प्रत्मथी / The Respondent. 2. आमकय आम क्त(अऩीर) / The CIT(A)- 3. आमकय आम क्त / CIT 4. विब गीम प्रतततनधध, आमकय अऩीरीम अधधकयण, भ ुंफई /
DR, ITAT, Mumbai ग र्ड प ईर / Guard file. 6. सत्म वऩत प्रतत //// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, उि/सहायक िंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.