Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy]
order
: March 13th, 2020 ORDER
Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Kolkata [‘CIT(A)’ for short] dated 09.09.2019 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short) for AY 2015-16.
After hearing rival contentions, I find that the assessee has raised certain additional grounds of appeal
before the ld. CIT(A). The additional ground of the appeal reads as follows: “1.0 That on the facts and in circumstances of the case and without prejudice to Ground No. 2, the A.O should have granted deduction towards corresponding interest expenses of borrowings utilized wholly and exclusively for earning interest on deposits u/s 57(iii) of the IT Act,1961. 2.0 That the appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, rescind, supplement, or alter the Ground stated here in above, either before or at the time of hearing of this appeal."
3. This has not been disposed off by the ld. CIT(A) on merits.
4. Under these circumstances, I set aside the matter to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication of the case.
Assessment Year: 2015-16 Attivo Economic Zones Pvt. Ltd. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 13th March, 2020.