VASUNDHARA VIHAR CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), KATIHAR
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “PATNA” BENCH, PATNA
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VP & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 23.04.2024 for the AY 2014-15.
At the outset, we note that the appeal of the assessee is barred by limitation by 250 days. At the time of hearing the counsel of the assessee explained the reasons for delay in filing the appeal. The Ld. D.R did not raise any objection in condoning the delay. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the delay is for bonafide and genuine reasons and hence, we condone the delay and adjudicate the appeal.
3.1. The learned DR on the other hand did not object for the same.
3.2. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the order has been passed by dismissing the appeal in Limine without condoning the delay of 190 days. As we found the reasons to be genuine and bona fide and therefore, condoning the same, we restore the appeal to the file of the Learned CIT (A) with a direction to decide the same on merit, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28.11.2025.
Sd/- Sd/- (DUVVURU RL REDDY) (RAJESH KUMAR) (VICE PRESIDENT) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Patna, Dated: 28.11.2025 Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS
Sr. Private Secretary/ Asst. Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna