MR.DEVANG VIJAY MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 17(1)(3), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, finding reasonable cause. On merits, the tribunal held that since the assessee did not claim any exempt income, no disallowance under Section 14A of the Act was permissible.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal with a delay of 152 days, attributing it to pursuing a rectification application before the CIT(A) due to a cryptic order. The CIT(A) disposed of the rectification application, and the assessee filed the appeal to the tribunal shortly thereafter.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned due to the assessee pursuing a rectification application. Whether disallowance under Section 14A is applicable when no exempt income is claimed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D”, BENCH
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): This appeal in A.Y.2013-14 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-55, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-55/ITO-17(1)(3)/IT-429/2017-18 dated 19/06/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 14/03/2016 by the ld. Income Tax Officer-17(1)(3), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
At the outset we find that there is a delay of 152 days in filing of appeal by the assessee. The assessee in his affidavit has stated that he was pursuing the rectification application before the ld. CIT(A) as the order of the ld. CIT(A) was very cryptic and had been passed without due consideration of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court on the impugned issue. The rectification application was disposed off by the ld. CIT(A) on 22/01/2019 and assessee had preferred appeal to the appellate Tribunal on 07/02/2019. We find lot of force in the argument of the ld. AR that the delay in filing of appeal before this Tribunal had occurred in view of the fact that assessee was pursuing alternative remedy by preferring the rectification application before the ld. CIT(A) and from the date of rectification order passed by the ld. CIT(A), the assessee has filed the appeal before us within 15 days thereon. In these peculiar facts and circumstances, we find that assessee was prevented by reasonable cause in not filing the appeal before this Tribunal in time and accordingly, we are inclined to condone the delay and admit the appeal of the assessee for adjudication.
The only effective issue raised by the assessee is with regard to the fact that assessee had not earned any exempt income and hence, no disallowance u/s.14A of the Act would operate on the same. We find from the order of the lower authorities that the assessee had not claimed any exempt income in the return of income. This fact is not disputed. Once there is no claim of exempt income, there cannot be any disallowance u/s.14A of the Act. This issue is now settled by various decisions of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court and also by Hon’ble Supreme Court. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee on merits are allowed.
3.1. In view of the aforesaid observation, the adjudication of ground No.1 raised by the assessee on violation of principles of natural justice becomes academic in nature. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on this 02/08/2019
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026