DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S BT GLOBAL COMMUNICATION INDIA P LTD., MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 506/DEL/2016Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 October 2018AY 2011-124 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the MAP resolution mandated the withdrawal of the protective adjustment for AY 2011-12. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed as infructuous.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the deletion of a protective adjustment made by the TPO. The assessee presented a resolution of dispute under the MAP with the United Kingdom.

What were the issues?

Whether a protective adjustment made by the TPO should be deleted in light of a Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) resolution with the United Kingdom.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 144C(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘I-1’ BENCH,

Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, & MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE

For Appellant: Shri Anant Periwal, CA
Hearing: 24.10.2018Pronounced: 31.10.2018

Heard together (2 matters)

CO No. 152/DEL/2016
ITA No. 506/DEL/2016

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER,

1.

This appeal by the Revenue and cross objection by the assessee are preferred against the order dated 21.12.2015 framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act]' pertaining to A.Y 2011-12. Both the appeal and cross objections were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity.

2.

The solitary grievance raised by the Revenue is that the DRP erred in deleting the adjustment made on protective basis amounting to Rs. 93,81,11,053/-.

3.

At the very outset, the ld. AR submitted the Resolution of Dispute under MAP with the United Kingdom in the case the assessee. The ld. AR also furnished a copy of the order giving effect to the resolution passed by the competent United Kingdom Tax Communication.

4.

We have carefully considered the Resolution of Dispute and the order giving effect to the resolution passed by the competent United Kingdom Tax Communication.

5.

As per the resolution of dispute under MAP with United Kingdom dated 29.01.2019, it has been resolved that for AY 2011-12, protective adjustment made by the TPO would be withdrawn in toto, i.e, there will not be any adjustment in A.Y 2011-12 on protective basis. The Addl. CIT, Special Range – 2, New Delhi vide order dated 27.04.2018, gave effect to the resolution passed by the competent United Kingdom Tax Communication under MAP and accordingly, modified the order framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Act, thereby determining total assessed income after MAP at NIL.

6.

Considering the aforesaid order, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as having become infructuous.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in CO No. 152/DEL/2016 are dismissed.

The order is pronounced in the open court on 31.10.2018.

More judgments on Section 144C(3)

All 595 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144C(3) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →