MAHINDRA TELECOMMUNICATIONS INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MAHINDRA AIR SERVICES LIMITED ),MUMBAI vs. ITO 2(2)(3), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6248/MUM/2017Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 August 2019AY 2013-144 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, following its own prior order in the assessee's own case for AY 2008-09, rejected the assessee's ground of appeal. The Tribunal upheld the addition of the amount as interest income.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed that an amount treated as interest on capital contributed to another company was embedded in the option price for share sale and not accrued. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) treated it as accrued interest income.

What were the issues?

Whether the 11% annual return on equity investment, as per a shareholder's agreement, accrues annually or is taxable only upon the transfer of shares.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HONBLE & SHRI M. BALAGANESH, HONBLE

For Appellant: Shri H.P. Mahajani
For Respondent: Shri Chaitanya Anjaria
Hearing: 26.07.2019Pronounced: 08.08.2019

O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD (JM) 1. These two appeals are filed by the assessee against different orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income–tax (Appeals)–5, Mumbai [hereinafter in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 10.07.2017 for the A.Ys. 2013-14 & 2014-15.

2.

Assessee has raised the following common ground in both these appeals except for the figures: -

2 & 6249/MUM/2017 (A.Ys: 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/s. Mahindra Telecommunications Investment Pvt. Ltd., “1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of ₹.47,86,212 to income as interest on capital contributed by the Appellant Company in the shares of the another company without appreciating that the said amount was embedded in option price receivable on the sale of the said shares and hence, not accrued and due for the year under consideration.”

3.

At the time of hearing, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee had an investment in equity shares AT & T Global Network Services India P. Ltd, which has been purchased in pursuance of shareholder's agreement dated 07.03.2006. The shareholder's agreement among other terms also provided that AT & T Global Network Holdings LLC, shall have the first right to purchase the assessee's shareholding in AT & T Global Network Services India P. Ltd. either directly or through a third party by exercising its call option and paying to the assessee option price which is agreed to be the price payable for the total equity investment of the assessee plus 11% annual return, computed annually on the capitalization date over the life of the equity holding period and pro-rated for the period of holding between the immediately prior anniversary capitalization date and the date of divestiture. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the Assessing Officer and the Ld.CIT(A), following the ITAT order for AY 2008-09, held that, the assessee was entitled to an assured return @11% on its equity investment on accrual basis which was assessable on time proportion basis. It was the contention of the assessee that the said return could be assessed only as 3 & 6249/MUM/2017 (A.Ys: 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/s. Mahindra Telecommunications Investment Pvt. Ltd., a gain at the time of transfer of the said shares and not earlier. The addition was made under the head Business income.

4.

Ld. Counsel for the assessee further submits that Hon'ble ITAT has upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer. Copy of the order is placed on record at Page. No. 61 to 93 of the Paper Book. It is further submitted that the assessee has filed an appeal before Hon'ble High Court and the same has been admitted. Copy of the order is placed on record.

5.

Ld. DR vehemently supported the orders of the authorities below.

6.

We have heard the rival submissions, perused the orders of the authorities below. In view of the submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee and respectfully following the order of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the A.Y. 2008-09 in ITA.No. 2832/Mum/2012 dated 24.05.2016 the ground raised by the assessee is rejected.

7.

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on the 08th August, 2019

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →