THE DCIT CC-6(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S. MARATHON REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable as it fell below the revised monetary limit for filing appeals as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The tax effect involved in the appeal was found to be less than Rs. 50 lacs.
What were the issues?
Maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT based on the tax effect and CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” Bench, Mumbai
O R D E R
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM
The captioned appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-54, Mumbai, dated 28.06.2017, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed by the A.O under Sec.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’), dated 28.03.2016.
We find that the ‘tax effect’ involved in the present appeal filed by the revenue is less than Rs.50 lacs. On the basis of the aforesaid fact, the appeal filed by the revenue as per the monetary limits revised by the CBDT vide its Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 is found to be not maintainable.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026