SANGEETA METAL(INDIA),MUMBAI vs. ITO 19(3)(2), MUMBAI

This is an appeal by the assessee wherein the assessee is aggrieved that the learned CIT-A has erred in sustaining 12.5% disallowance on account of bogus purchases, vide order dated 09.10.2017 pertaining to assessment year 2010-11.

Brief facts of the case are that assessee in this case is engaged in business of trading in ferrous and non ferrous metals. The Assessment in this case was reopened upon receipt of information from the sales tax Department that assessee has made bogus purchases. The assessee submitted the purchase vouchers and the payments were made through banking channel. However the suppliers were not produced before the assessing officer. Sales in this case were not doubted.