PANASONIC AVC NETWORKS INDIA CO. LTD.,NOIDA vs. JCIT, SPL. RANGE-7, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn based on the assessee's application. Liberty was granted to revive the appeal if the VSVS settlement fails.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for AY 2015-16. The assessee subsequently applied for withdrawal of the appeal as the issue was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The procedure for revival of appeal if the settlement fails.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI
PER BENCH :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 30.09.2019, for the Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee furnished an application by the assessee dated 27.12.2024 for withdrawal of appeal as the assessee has settled the issue under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (in short ‘VSVS’). The assessee alongwith application has also furnished a copy of Form No.2 received from the 2 Department. In view of the aforesaid application, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty is granted to the assessee to revive appeal in the event application filed by the assessee under VSVS fails to mature. It is further made clear that if the assessee/appellant seeks to restore the appeal in the event assessee’s declaration made under VSVS is not accepted, the Registry shall not insist for filing of application for condonation of delay, if the Miscellaneous Application for recalling the order is filed beyond time on account of delay in communication of outcome under VSVS. [Revenue. M/s. Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT in T.C.A. No.372 of 2020 decided on 16.10.2020 by Hon’ble Madras High Court.]
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed in the terms aforesaid. Order pronounced in the open court on Friday, the 10TH day of January, 2025 after the conclusion of hearing. Dated: 10.01.2025 TS
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026