DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SHRIRAM PISTONS & RINGS LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per CBDT Circular No. 03 of 2018 and Section 268A of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue should not have filed or should have withdrawn the appeal due to the low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the Pr.CIT for Assessment Year 2012-13. The tax effect in the appeal was admittedly less than Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue with a tax effect below the prescribed limit should be entertained.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES: ‘C’, NEW DELHI
Dy.CIT, Circle 23(1) vs. M/s Shriram Pistons & Rings Room No.248, C.R.Building Ltd. IP Estate 23, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New Delhi 110 002 New Delhi 110 001 PAN: AAACS0229G (Appellant) (Respondent) Department by : Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. D.R. Assessee by : Sh. R.K.Kapoor, Adv. Date of Hearing : 27/11/2018 Date of Pronouncement: 27/11/2018 ORDER
PER BEENA A PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The appeal is filed by Revenue against order dated 16.06.2015 of Ld.Pr.CIT(OSD) (A)-8, New Delhi pertaining to A.Y. 2012-13. Admittedly the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs.
In terms of CBDT Circular No. 03 of 2018, dated 11th July, 2018 read with S.268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Revenue should have either not filed the present appeal, or should have withdrawn the same, as tax effect in this appeal is admittedly less than Rs. 20,00,000/-. 3. In view of the above, the appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed. 4. In the result, appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 27th November, 2018. Sd/- Sd/- ( N.K. SAINI) (BEENA A PILLAI) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Dt. 27TH November, 2018 *GMV
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026