Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘D’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SHRI KULDIP SINGH
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘D’ : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.5816/Del./2015 Sarv Hitkari Educational Society, vs. CIT (Exemptions), Pocket – B, Flat No.94-C, New Delhi. Dilshad Garden, Delhi.
(PAN : AABTS9050K) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT)
ASSESSEE BY : Shri Sanjay Kumar, CA and Shri Akash Garg, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri J.K. Mishra, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 27.11.2018 Date of Order : 30.11.2018 O R D E R PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : The appellant, Sarv Hitkari Educational Society (hereinafter referred to as ‘the assessee society’) by filing the present appeal,
sought to set aside the impugned order under section 12AA (3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) dated 03.09.2015 passed by Ld. CIT (Exemptions), New Delhi on the following grounds inter alia that:-
2 ITA No.5816/Del./2015
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case the order passed by the ld. CIT (E) is bad in law and illegal and deserves to be quashed. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT (E) has grossly erred in withdrawing the registration u/s 12A granted to the assessee society sine 27.12.1999 vide an order u/s 12AA (3) dated 03.09.2015, further followed by an addendum order dated 04.09.2015 u/s 12AA (3) making the withdrawal retrospectively effective from 2008-09 without affording an opportunity. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the grounds on which the aforesaid registration granted to the society has been withdrawn have no substance/merits in law and thus the order of ld. CIT (E) deserved to be quashed.”
Briefly stated the facts necessary for adjudication of the
controversy at hand are : on receipt of the report from the
Assessing Officer that the assessee society had disposed off a land
belonging to it for a consideration of Rs.7,50,000/- out of books of
account and consequent addition of Rs.7,50,000/- was made u/s
69B of the Act. Treating the factum of disposing off its land for
Rs.7,50,000/- by the assessee Trust without permission as
ingenuine activity, the ld. CIT (A) cancelled the registration
granted to the assessee society u/s 12A of the Act.
Feeling aggrieved, the assessee society has come up before
the Tribunal by way of filing the present appeal challenging the
impugned order passed by the ld. CIT (E).
3 ITA No.5816/Del./2015
We have heard the ld. Authorized Representatives of the
parties to the appeal, gone through the documents relied upon and
orders passed by the revenue authorities below in the light of the
facts and circumstances of the case.
Undisputedly, the assessee society being engaged into
charitable activities was granted registration u/s 12A of the Act on
27.10.1999. It is also not in dispute that during the year under
assessment, the concerned AO made addition of Rs.7,50,000/- to
the income of the assessee society u/s 69B of the Act by noticing
that assessee society has sold land belonging to it without
permission of ld. CIT (E) which makes its activities ingenuine. It
is also not in dispute that initial sale deed dated 24.07.2006 qua
land measuring 11 canals 19 marlas was executed by one Darshan
Singh in favour of assessee society. It is also not in dispute that
vide sale deed dated 26.09.2007, the same land measuring 11
canals 19 marlas stood re-transferred to Darshan Singh by the
assessee society. It is also not in dispute that the addition of
Rs.7,50,000/- made by the AO u/s 69B has been accepted by the
assessee society having not been appealed against.
Further, on the other hand, the ld. DR for the Revenue to
repel the arguments addressed by ld.AR for the assessee contended
that since the CIT (E) had imposed a condition while granting
4 ITA No.5816/Del./2015
registration u/s 12A of the Act that the assessee society will not
transfer its property except with permission, the registration has
been rightly cancelled.
No doubt, section 12AA (3) empowers the ld.CIT (E) to
cancel the registration of any Trust in case, “he is satisfied that the
activities of such Trust are not genuine or are not even carried out
in accordance with the object of the Trust.”
Before proceeding further, we would like to peruse the
show-cause notice issued by ld. CIT (E) for cancellation of
registration granted u/s 12A to the assessee society, available at
pages 60 & 61 of the paper book, which is extracted for ready
perusal as under :-
“OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), 3RD FLOOR, AAYKAR BHAWAN, LAXMI NAGAR DISTRICT CENTRE, DELHI.110092 PAN: Dated: To, The Principal Officer, Sarve Hitkari Educational Society New Delhi Regd 389, Deepali, Pitampura, New Delhi-34 Sir, Sub : Show cause notice for withdrawal of registration u/s 12AA(3) of The Income-tax Act, 1961 – reply regarding.
5 ITA No.5816/Del./2015
This office is in receipt of a report from the concerned Assessing Officer of your society, wherein it has been reported that society has sold a land for Rs.7,50,000/- out of books. Since the said land was sold out of books, a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- was added u/s 69B of the Act and taxed in A.Y. 2008-09 accordingly.
In view of above, it is clear that society has entered into purchase and sale consideration out of books which is a serious violation under the IT Act. Further, while granting registration u/s 12AA, the office of DIT(E) vide order dated 25/10/1999 has imposed certain conditions, one of the conditions, vide item No.(vii) is reproduced as under:-
No asset shall be transferred without the knowledge of the undersigned to anyone including to any trust society non-profit company.
Since the society has sold the land without the permission of this office and moreover the transaction has not been accounted in the books of accounts which was confronted to the society and the same admitted. There is gross violation of IT provisions. Hence genuineness of charitable activities earned by your society is not established.
In light of above facts and non-compliance to the conditions laid down in the registration certificate, you are required in show cause in writing as to why registration granted u/s 12A to the society be not withdrawn in your case.
In this regard, your case is fixed for hearing on 14/6/2011 at 10.30 AM. If you do not wish to avail the opportunity personally, you may submit your reply in writing through an Authorized Representative while any such order is passed. Please note if in case of non- compliance, it will be presumed that you have nothing to say in this regard and the matter will be decided on the basis of material available on record and in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Also produce books of account for F.Y. 2006-07 and 2007-08 on the above date. SD/- (P.V.Rao) Director of Income Tax (Exemptions). Delhi.
6 ITA No.5816/Del./2015
Bare perusal of show-cause notice, reproduced above, goes
to prove that the ld. CIT (A) has not called upon the assessee Trust
to show-cause that its activities are not genuine or are not being
carried out in accordance with the object of the Trust rather
cancelled the registration on the sole ground that the assessee has
transferred its land without prior permission of the CIT (E) and
hence indulged into ingenuine activity.
The ld. AR for the assessee society to substantiate his
arguments that the land in question has never been transferred in
the name of the society as it was without any consideration, drew
our attention towards remand report given by the AO, available at
pages 98 to 102 of the paper book. AO, in his remand report
regarding purchase of land by the assessee society vide sale deed
dated 24.07.2006 from Darshan Singh, brought on record the fact
that since the son of Darshan Singh, owner of the land in question,
was working as workshop superintendent in assessee society’s
college, he has transferred the land in question in the name of
assessee society so as to show the total holding of 18.5 acres of
land with the assessee society as per conditions laid down by All
India Council of Technical Education (AICTE).
7 ITA No.5816/Del./2015
Though an account payee cheque no.420931 dated
24.07.2006 for a consideration ofRs.7,37,000/- was taken by him
but the same was never encashed and possession of the land was
also not transferred to the assessee society. AO, in his remand
report, has also categorically mentioned that stamp duty for
registration of both the sale deeds dated 24.07.2006 & 26.09.2007
have been incurred by the assessee society which have been duly
recorded in the books of account and no payment has been
mentioned in the books of account for the cost of purchase of land
in question. AO, in his remand report, has also mentioned that the
real motive for execution of the sale deed by Darshan Singh in
assessee society’s name to satisfy the conditions laid down by
AICTE to show the land measuring 18.5 acres to start a
polytechnic college.
No doubt, the land in question was transferred in the name of
assessee society by Darshan Singh by virtue of the sale deed dated
24.07.2006 but its sale consideration has never been passed as the
cheque for Rs.7,37,000/- handed over to Darshan Singh has never
been encahsed nor any payment in cash is proved to have been
made to Darshan Singh by assessee society as books of account has
been duly scrutinized by the AO. So the sale deed dated
24.07.2006 in favour of the assessee society being without
8 ITA No.5816/Del./2015
consideration is void ab initio. Moreover, the land in question
stood re-transferred in the name of Darshan Singh by virtue of sale
deed dated 26.09.2007.
When the assessee society has not become the owner of the
land in question by virtue of sale deed dated 24.07.2006, the same
being without consideration, there is no question of violating the
terms and conditions laid down by the ld. CIT (E) for transferring
the land of the assessee society without his permission. Moreover,
when it is also undisputed fact that possession of land remained
throughout with Darshan Singh, it shows the statements of Darshan
Singh and Rakesh Chand Bajaj recorded by the AO during remand
proceedings that the land in question has merely shown to have
been transferred to satisfy the conditions laid down by the AICTE
to start a polytechnic college are true and correct and as such, no
malafide can be attributed. Rather it was a mutual arrangement
between them.
In view of what has been discussed above, we are of the
considered view that when the assessee society has not become the
owner of the land in question, there is no question of indulging in
into ingenuine activities or that the activities of assessee society
are not being carried out in accordance with the object of the Trust.
Moreover, it is nowhere the case of the CIT (E) that the assessee
9 ITA No.5816/Del./2015
society is not running in accordance with its aims and objects. No
doubt, assessee society has entered into a sham transaction by
virtue of the sale deeds dated 24.07.2006 and 26.09.2007 qua the
land in question in order to misrepresent AICTE to get the approval
for setting up a polytechnic college, but this fact has not proved in
any manner that the activities of the assessee trust are not genuine
or are not being carried out in accordance with its aims and objects.
Rather in the remand report it is recorded by the AO that assessee
society is running an educational institution having 1000 students
on its roll with huge teaching staff and no complaint has been
received as to its activities.
The contention of the ld. DR that once the addition made by
the AO u/s 69B of the Act qua the sale of land in question for a
consideration of Rs.7,50,000/- by the assessee society has been
accepted by the assessee, the assessee society is estopped from
claiming that it has not transferred the land in the name of Darshan
Singh, is not sustainable as discussed in the preceding paras that it
cannot be treated as a sale transaction at all being without
consideration, factum of merely accepting the addition made by
AO u/s 69B, would not change the legal position.
So, we are of the considered view that ld. CIT (E) has erred
in cancelling the registration granted to the assessee society u/s
10 ITA No.5816/Del./2015
12A of the Act. Consequently, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and CIT (E) is directed to restore/grant the registration to
assessee society u/s 12A of the Act. Order pronounced in open court on this 30th day of November, 2018.
Sd/- sd/- (N.K. BILLAIYA) (KULDIP SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated the 30th day of November, 2018 TS