SAIC MOTOR CORPORATION LTD,CHINA vs. DCIT,INTERNATIONAL TAX, GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee did not have a Fixed Place PE or Supervisory PE in India. The Tribunal found that the property in goods passed outside India, and the sale was concluded offshore, thus no income accrued or arose to the assessee in India.
What were the facts?
The assessee, SAIC Motor Corporation Ltd., a Chinese company, supplied knocked-down (KD) parts and technology licenses to its Indian subsidiary, MGMIPL. The Assessing Officer (AO) proposed to tax income attributable to a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, alleging offshore sales were not genuine.
What were the issues?
Whether the supply of KD parts by the assessee to its Indian subsidiary constituted offshore sales, and whether the assessee had a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- DIT v. Morgan Stanley & Co.360 citing292 ITR 416 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- (i) Formula One World Championship Ltd. v. CIT200 citing394 ITR 80 · 2017 · SC
- DIT v. Morgan Stanley Co. Inc.162 citing399 ITR 34 · 2017 · SC
- IT Solution Inc. v. ADIT73 citing86 Taxmann.com 240 · 2017 · SC
- Flipkart Internet (P). Limited v. DCIT International Taxation33 citing139 Taxmann.com 595 · 2022 · HC
- Progress Rail Locomotive Inc. v. DCIT8 citing466 ITR 76 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘D’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI VIMAL KUMAR & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM,
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessing Officer), Gurgaon, dated 29.01.2025 passed u/s 143(3)/144C (13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) arising out of directions of Dispute Resolution Panel dated 13.12.2024 pertaining to Assessment Year 2022-23
ITA No.- 1191/Del/2025 SAIC Motor Corpora"on Ltd.
The Assessee e-filed its return of income vide acknowledgment No.820
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026