SRI RENGA FASHIONS,COIMBATORE vs. ITO, COIMBATORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the availability of interest-free funds needs to be examined before disallowing interest. Therefore, the issue was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh re-examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns the disallowance of Rs. 34,27,065/- towards interest under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee claimed sufficient interest-free funds were available, while the revenue representative requested a re-examination of the available funds.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of interest is justified when sufficient interest-free funds are available with the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI,
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Coimbatore dated 30.03.2017 and pertains to the assessment year 2012-2013.
Shri. K. Raghu, Ld. Representative for the assessee submitted that the only issue arises for consideration is disallowance of �34,27,065/- towards interest u/s.36(1) (iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘’the Act’’). According to the ld. Representative the total available interest free fund with the assessee is �1,59,51,085/-. The investments made during the year is Rs.1,60,00,000/-. The assessee had also profit to the extent of �80,00,000/-. Therefore there cannot be any disallowance towards interest.
On the contrary, Shri Pavitran Kumar, the Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that the available funds needs to be verified after considering the Balance Sheet and other materials and therefore the matter may be remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer.
We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the material available on record. This tribunal is of the considered opinion that interest free funds available with the assessee needs to be examined before making any disallowance u/s.36(1) (iii) of the Act. Therefore as rightly submitted by the ld. Departmental Representative, this issue need to be re- examined by the Assessing Officer. Accordingly, orders of both the authorities below are set aside and the entire issue raised by the assessee is remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer to re-examine the issue afresh in the light of the material available on record and other material that may be filed by the assessee and thereafter decide the issue afresh in accordance with law, after giving a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in 2012-2013 is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 7th February, 2020 at Camp at Coimbatore.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(iii)
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shah Brothers, West Singhbhum vs ACIT/DCIT, Cen Cir-1, RanchiITA 239/RAN/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026