GANGA JEWELLERY,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting opinions, both appeals should be heard by the same authority. Therefore, the appeal was remitted back to the CIT(A) to be heard along with the pending appeal against the assessment order.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, which enhanced interest levied under Section 234B. The original appeal against the assessment order was still pending before another CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal arising from a Section 154 proceeding should be heard along with the main assessment appeal to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting decisions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI S.JAYARAMAN
: Ms. S. Sriniranjani, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by Mr. AR.V.Srinivasan,JCIT,D.R सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 27.11.2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of : 20.02.2020 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R PER S.JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, Chennai in 19, dated 27.05.2019 for the assessment year 2013-14. :- 2 -:
The assessee, M/s.Ganga Jewellery, is a partnership firm, engaged in the business of gold jewellery. A survey under Section133A of the Act was conducted on 10.05.2012. The case was taken for scrutiny and the assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Act on 18.12.2005 wherein a sum of ".83,54,375/- was added unaccounted investment and ".1,00,539/- was disallowed as excess claim of interest payment.
Aggrieved with the order of the A.O., the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A)-16, which is pending for disposal. In the meantime, an order under Section.154 of the Act dated 02.01.2019 was passed enhancing the interest levied under Section.234B of the Act.
It was submitted by Ld. A.R. that the present appeal arises against the order passed by the A.O. under Section 154 of the Act wherein the interest under Section.234B of the Act was enhanced by ₹.4,93,340/-. The Ld. A.R. pleaded before us that the appeal filed against the assessment
order is still pending for disposal, therefore, the matter may be sent back to the file of the learned CIT(A)-16 to dispose the present appeal also along with the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment order.
Per contra, the Ld. D.R. submitted that the original appeal was pending before the CIT(A)-16, and this appeal was disposed by the CIT(A)-19. On a query from the Bench, why the appeal arising out of Section 154 proceeding could not be disposed of along with main appeal? :- 3 -:
In response to a query, the Ld. D.R. submitted that the matter may be remitted back to the file of learned CIT(A) so that all the appeals filed by the assessee are to be heard and decided by one of the learned C’sIT(A).
We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. It is noticed that when two different proceedings arose out of the same assessment, the Tribunal is of the considered opinion that only one authority has to dispose both the appeals in order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting judicial opinion. Even though levy of interest under Section 234B of the Act is mandatory, it would depend upon the decision taken by the CIT(A)-16. Considering the submissions made by both the sides in all fairness, the appeal arising out of the proceedings under Section154 of the Act has also to be heard by the learned CIT(A) along with the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment order. Necessary administrative steps shall be taken to post the appeal before the same learned CIT(A), who is handling the appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment order. In the interests of co-ordination and the justice, we deem it fit to remit this issue back to the file of learned CIT(A) and all the appeals filed by the assessee against the assessment order be heard by the same learned C’sIT(A) to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting judicial opinion. :- 4 -:
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on the 20th February,2020 in Chennai. (एन.आर.एस .गणेशन) (एस जयरामन) (N.R.S. GANESAN) (S. JAYARAMAN) लेखा सद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "या"यकसद"य/Judicial Member
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026