ZEN MATRIX PVT. LTD,AHMEDABAB vs. THE PR. CIT-3, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as the issue had been resolved in subsequent proceedings. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263. The Assessing Officer subsequently initiated proceedings under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 and granted relief on the issue raised by the PCIT.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal against the PCIT's order under Section 263 should be dismissed as withdrawn due to subsequent relief granted by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE- & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL
आदेश / O R D E R
PER P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad-3 (“PCIT” in short) dated 31.03.2021 passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” in short).
At the time of hearing fixed in this case today, it is noticed that the assessee has filed a letter dated 3rd May, 2022 seeking permission for withdrawal of appeal on the ground that the Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act and granted relief on the issue taken by the PCIT under the revisional proceedings. The assessee, vide aforesaid letter, pleaded that the appeal filed by the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn. The learned Departmental Representative has no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee.
Zen Matrix Pvt Ltd Vs. PCIT AY : 2015-16 2
Therefore, in view of these facts, we allow the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee; and, accordingly appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 10th May, 2022 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026