DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. OMAX AUTOS LTD, GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowances. The AO's objections were primarily based on the admission of additional evidence, which the AO himself verified and found no adverse remarks on in remand reports.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the CIT(A)'s order which deleted several disallowances made by the AO. The disallowances pertained to unverified deductions, trade advances written off, bad debts written off, inventory written off, and long-term capital gains on land sale.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting disallowances made by the AO on account of unverified expenses and gains, particularly when additional evidence was admitted and verified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- TRF Ltd. v. CIT714 citing323 ITR 397 · 2010 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA&
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 10.01.2025 of the Ld. CIT(A)-29, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld.
First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. 'FAA') in Appeals No: CIT(A), Page 2 Omax Autos Ltd. (AY: 2020-21)
Delhi-29 10556/2019-20arising out of the order dated 23.09.2022 u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') passed by the ACIT, Central Circle-27 for AY: 2020-21. 2. The assessee, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43(6)
- Karnavati Rolling Mills Private Limited… vs The ITO, Ward-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1714/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Edwise International Prop Edwise… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Cirlce…ITA 4878/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Frostees India Pvt. Ltd., North Twenty Four… vs D.C.I.T., Circle - 11(1), KolkataITA 2204/KOL/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Manjushree Technopack Limited, Bangalore vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1282/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed15 Jun 2026AY 2020-21
- Assistant Commissionr of Income Tax… vs Globeop Financial Services Technologies…ITA 6934/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Jun 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026