BRISK INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPERS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-73, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the VSVS scheme to settle the dispute. Therefore, the appeal was treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Additional CIT under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act. Subsequently, the assessee opted to avail the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS) 2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI
This appeal of the Assessee arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-38, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘CITA(A)’] in Ap. No.10148/2019-20 for A.Y. 2015-16
Page 1 of 3 Brisk Infrastructure Vs. Addl. CIT against the order passed by Addl. CIT, Range-73, New Delhi u/s 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) on 31.03.2018 for the Assessment Year 2014-15.
The learned AR filed letter dated 01.01.2025 stating that assessee had opted to avail VSVS scheme 2024 for which declaration in form No.1 has already been filed.
Since the assessee had opted settling the dispute arising out of this appeal by availing VSVS scheme, 2024, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby treated as withdrawn with liberty to be given to the assessee to get this appeal restored on an application made by it in the event of the declaration made under VSVS scheme, 2024 not attaining finality for any reason whatsoever.
With the above mentioned liberty given to the assessee, the appeal filed is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 01.01.2025
More judgments on Section 271C
- Sbi, (Erstwhile Sbbj), Baran vs ITO (TDS), KotaITA 143/JPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Jagadish Panchal, Udaipur vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 314/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Teampumkin Corporation, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer (TDS)-2(3)(2), MumbaiITA 5318/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Teampumkin Corporation, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer (TDS)-2(3)(2) Mumbai…ITA 5281/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6199/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026