VIVEK ARORA,DELHI vs. AO, NFAC, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the appeal had become infructuous as the issue was settled under VSVS. Therefore, the appeal was treated as withdrawn and dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). At the time of hearing, no one appeared for the assessee, but a letter stated that the assessee had opted to settle the appeal under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS) and had been issued Form-4.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI
O R D E R
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM:
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (‘the CIT(A)’ in short) dated 29.06.2024 in Appeal No. NFAC/2014- 15/10277634 arising out of the order passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short) dated 26.05.2023 for Assessment Year 2015-16.
At the time of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee. However, vide letter dated 24.10.2025, it has been intimated that the assessee has opted to settle the aforementioned appeal under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (“VSVS”, for short) and that the Designated Authority has already issued Form-4 under VSVS. We took notice of the aforesaid letter dated 24.10.2025. Copy of Form-4 issued by Designated Authority under VSVS was also enclosed with the aforesaid letter. Ld. Vivek Arora vs. AO, NFAC Sr. DR for Revenue submitted before us that this appeal may be treated as withdrawn and may be dismissed on account of the aforesaid VSVS. After due consideration and in view of the foregoing, we are of the opinion that this appeal has become infructuous as the issue before us has already been settled under VSVS thus this appeal having become infructuous, is treated as withdrawn and is hereby dismissed.
Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if for some reason the disputes under this appeal before us are not settled under the aforesaid VSVS, then the assessee will be at liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of this appeal in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 09.01.2026.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026