RAJBIR SINGH,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-19, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the current appeal as it had become infructuous due to a subsequent, correctly filed appeal. The tribunal accepted the withdrawal request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order dated 27.02.2025. The appeal was filed online, but inadvertently, Form 36 for AY 2012-13 was attached instead of the correct form. A second appeal was filed with the correct documentation and has already been heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn as infructuous due to a subsequent, correctly filed appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
This appeal is preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 27.02.2025 of the Ld. CIT(A)-27, Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in DIN & Order No :
P a g e | Rajbir Singh (2013-14) ITBA/APL/S/91/2024-25/25/1073780701(1) arising out of the order dated 18.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the ACIT, Circle 5(2) for AY: 2013- 14.
At the very out, the Ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee filed application for withdraw as follows:
“For the above said appeal we have to submit that the above-mentioned appeal was filed online. However, while filing the appeal, we did not generate Form 36, and inadvertently, Form 36 for the A.Y 2012-13 was attached while uploading the documents. We came to know about this discrepancy after receiving defective notice from ITAT. Since, Form 36 could not be generated, we had filed another appeal vide ITA No: 3104/del/2025 on 09/05/2025. The second appeal, filed on 09/05/2025, has already been heard and the order has been passed on 14/11/2025. Hence the above-mentioned appeal has become infructuous and we would like to withdraw the above- mentioned appeal.”
The appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 16.01.2026
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026