Facts
The assessee did not appear before the Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings, leading to an ex-parte order with additions. The assessee also failed to appear before the CIT(A), who dismissed the appeal without considering merits. The assessee's grounds of appeal challenge the CIT(A)'s decision to dismiss the appeal without a merit-based decision and adherence to natural justice principles.
Held
The Tribunal observed that the assessee failed to appear before both the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A), resulting in ex-parte orders. To meet the ends of justice and uphold natural justice, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for denovo adjudication with a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without considering the merits of the case, violating principles of natural justice.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRIK.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER
Date of Hearing – 07/01/2025 Date of Order – 27/01/2025
O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, J.M.
This appeal by the assessee is emanating from the impugned order dated 04/07/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2015–16.
In its appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:–
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT Appeals NFAC, Delhi has grossly erred in dismissing appeal of the assessee without considering the merits of the case. The order passed by CIT Appeals is illegal, invalid and against the principles of natural justice.
2 P. Ghode Petroleum ITA no.461/Nag./2024 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT Appeals NFAC, Delhi has grossly erred in not deciding the appeal on merits of the case. 3. The learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) NFAC, Delhi ought to have considered each of the grounds agitated before him and decided the appeal on merits. 4. The Appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, vary and / or withdraw any or all the above grounds of appeal.
3. While going through the orders of the authorities below, we find that the assessee did not appear before the Assessing Officer during the assessment proceedings and the Assessing Officer was forced to passed ex– parte order by making various additions. While making additions, it is the observations of the Assessing Officer that the assessee failed to furnish details or documentary evidences in response to the statutory notices issued by him. We also find that the assessee also failed to appear before the learned CIT(A) also during the first appellate proceedings. The learned CIT(A) observed that the assessee failed to comply with the statutory notices which remained non–complied by the assessee and hence the learned CIT(A) also passed the impugned order by dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee without going onto the merits of the issues raised by the assessee. Be that as it may. We are of the opinion that keeping in view the overall facts and circumstances of the case and to meet the ends of justice and following the principles of natural justice, one opportunity is hereby granted to the assessee to substantiate the case before the Assessing Officer. Consequently, we set aside the impugned order passed by the learned CIT(A) and restore the entire matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for denovo adjudication after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The 3 P. Ghode Petroleum ITA no.461/Nag./2024 assessee is also directed to be prompt in adhering to the statutory notices to be issued by the Assessing Officer without seeking any adjournment, except in exceptional case.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 27/01/2025