SANT TUKDOJI NAGRI SHAHKARI PAT SANSTHA LIMITED HINGANGHAT,HINGANGHAT vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD-2, WARDHA, WARDHA

PDF
ITA 448/NAG/2024Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 January 2025AY 2022-23Bench: SHRI V. DURGA RAO (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee's appeal emanates from an order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2022-23. The appeal was filed with a delay of 94 days, which the assessee explained as sufficiently justified with no mala fide intention.

Held

The learned CIT(A) is directed to condone the delay of 94 days. Consequently, the CIT(A) shall proceed to adjudicate the issue on its merit after considering all relevant submissions and providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Key Issues

The primary issue concerns condonation of a 94-day delay in filing the appeal and the subsequent adjudication of the matter on merit.

Sections Cited

250(6) of the Act

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. Dewani
For Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER

ITA no.448/Nag./2024 (Assessment Year : 2022–23) Sant Tukdoji Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. ……………. Appellant 37, Nandori Road, Hinganghat 442 301 PAN – AACAS0241C v/s Income Tax Officer ……………. Respondent Ward–2, Wardha Assessee by : Shri Kishore P. Dewani Revenue by : Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

Date of Hearing – 23/01/2025 Date of Order – 28/01/2025

O R D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M.

This appeal by the assessee is emanating from the impugned order dated 16/07/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2022–23.

2.

The learned CIT(A) is directed to condone the delay of 94 days as the assessee has sufficiently explained the reasons for delay and no mala fide intention can be ascribed. Thereafter he shall proceed to adjudicate the issue on merit and pass speaking order us/n 250(6) of the Act after considering all relevant submissions. The assessee be provided reasonable opportunity of being heard.

2 Sant Tukdoji Nagri ITA no.448/Nag./2024

3.

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 28/01/2025

Sd/- Sd/- V. DURGA RAO K.M. ROY JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER NAGPUR, DATED: 28/01/2025 Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Nagpur

SANT TUKDOJI NAGRI SHAHKARI PAT SANSTHA LIMITED HINGANGHAT,HINGANGHAT vs INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD-2, WARDHA, WARDHA | BharatTax