KHANDAL VIPRA SAMAJ,SURAT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD
Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(E). The assessee's authorized representative filed a request letter seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
Held
The Departmental Representative for the Revenue did not object to the withdrawal request. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer for withdrawal.
Key Issues
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn on the request of the assessee.
Sections Cited
Rule 34 of ITAT Rules, 1963
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(E)’] dated 30/03/2025. 2. A request letter dated 20th September-2025 of the Ld.AR for the assessee, has been placed on the file, wherein it is stated that the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the captioned appeal. The Ld. Departmental Asst. Year : 2025-26
2 Representative for the Revenue did not express any objection in this regard. Accordingly, the prayer of the assessee for withdrawal is accepted.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order is pronounced under provision of Rule 34 of ITAT Rules, 1963 on 26 /09/2025. (Bijayananda Pruseth) Judicial Member िदनांक/Dated 26/09/2025 टी.सी.नायर, व.िन.स./T.C. NAIR, Sr. PS आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ" / The Appellant
""थ" / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु" / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु" ( ) / The CIT(E)- Ahmedabad अपील 5. िवभागीय "ितिनिध , , सूरत /AR,ITAT, Surat/Ahmedabad. आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण 6. गाड" फाईल / Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स"ािपत "ित //// सहायक पंजीकार (Asstt.