RANDHEER SINGH RANA,GHAZIABAD vs. INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCHES

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5340/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 January 2026AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the possibility of communication gaps. Considering the larger interest of justice, the Tribunal decided to restore the appeal back to the CIT(A) for a fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for assessment year 2015-16 was filed against an order involving proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act. The assessee's counsel argued that due to communication gaps, the assessee could not adequately present their case before the lower appellate authority.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be restored to the CIT(A) due to communication gaps preventing the assessee from presenting their case effectively.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA

For Respondent: Ms. Ankush Kalra, Sr. DR
Hearing: 21.01.2026Pronounced: 21.01.2026

ORDER

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM

1.

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2015-16, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1078090610(1), dated 01.07.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

Learned counsel submits that on account of communication gaps at various levels, the assessee could not appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings and therefore, larger interest of justice would be met, in case, the matter may be restored back to the CIT(A). The Revenue vehemently support the learned lower authorities action making addition(s) herein on merits.

3.

Be that as it may, the fact remains that possibility of some communication gaps at various levels in such an instance could not be altogether ruled out. It is therefore deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A) for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities of hearing at the appellant’s risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →