Loading judgment…
Facts
The appeal was filed by the assessee against an order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee's representative appeared and stated they did not wish to press the appeal. The Departmental Representative did not object to the withdrawal.
Held
The assessee's counsel sought to withdraw the appeal. The Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal. Therefore, the tribunal treated the appeal as withdrawn.
Key Issues
Whether the assessee can withdraw the appeal.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER
Date of Hearing – 29/01/2025 Date of Order – 30/01/2025
O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, J.M.
The aforesaid appeal by the assessee is emanating from the impugned order dated 30/01/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2013–14.
2. Shri Abhay Agrawal, Advocate, appearing for the assessee was present during the hearing before us. He submitted that he did not wish to press this appeal and prayed for withdrawal of appeal. The learned Departmental Representative did not object to the withdrawal of appeal by the assessee. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.
2 Purshottam Narayanrao Jadhao ITA no.234/Nag./2024
In the result, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 30/01/2025