NAYI SUVIDHA FOUNDATION,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's claim that their submissions were ignored by the Assessing Officer, despite being filed with supporting documents. The CIT(E) was directed to re-consider the matter denovo.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Nayi Suvidha Foundation, appealed against an order dated 15/02/2024, where the CIT(E) rejected its 12A registration application and cancelled its provisional registration under section 12AB. The assessee had filed for registration and submitted clarifications as requested, but claimed the Assessing Officer ignored their submissions.
What were the issues?
Whether the Assessing Officer was justified in rejecting the 12A registration and cancelling the provisional registration granted under section 12AB, considering the assessee's submissions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER
Date of Hearing – 04/02/2024 Date of Order – 05/02/2025
O R D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M.
The aforesaid appeal by the assessee is emanating from the impugned order dated 15/02/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune, [“learned CIT(E)”] rejecting the registration application under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") by the Assessing Officer and cancellation of provisional registration granted on 30/11/2022, under section 12AB of the Act.
In its appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds:–
“Whether on the facts and circumstances the Assessing Officer was justified in rejecting application for 12A registration and cancellation of provisional registration granted on 30/11/2022 under section 12AB.
2 Nayi Suvidha Foundation ITA no.224/Nag./2024 3. Before us, the learned Authorised Representative furnished written submissions the contents of which are as follows:–
“Issue under consideration: Rejection of application for 12A registration Memorandum of Appeal: Whether on the facts and circumstances the learned assessing officer was justified in rejecting application for 12A registration and cancellation of provisional registration granted on 30/11/2022 under section 12AB. Appellant's Submission: The Appellant has filed application for registration u/s 12A of the Act, having Application No. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE/2023-24/12AA/13071 in Form No. 10AB under clause (iii) of section 12A(1) (ac) of the Act, on 29/09/2023. On verification of application Assessing Officer has issued Notice on 24/11/2023 requesting to upload certain information /clarification, with response to this notice appellant has submitted all requisite information / clarification asked for though notice within due date. On further verification, assessing officer noticed some discrepancies and intimate said discrepancies through issuing Notice on 02/02/2024 and asked to submit response on or before 09/02/2024. The appellant has submitted response to notice on 09/02/2024 and submitted all relevant documents and information. However, the learned Assessing officer ignored submission made by Appellant and all important facts and submission of the appellant submitted ori 09/02/2024 and accordingly rejected the Application for 12A along with provisional registration granted on 30/11/2022 under section 12AB without considering the submission made by appellant and without giving any opportunity of being heard to the appellant stating in order that the Assessee did not responded to the Notice for which response due on 09/02/2024. We herewith attaching copy of Order issued by Assessing Officer along with screen shot of filing response on 09/02/2024 on Income Tax Portal along with all supporting documents and information submitted to substantiate the genuineness of the activities of the assessee along with other query raised by Assessing Officer in Notice. Considering the above facts, the appellant prays that the rejection of application for Registration u/s 12A and cancellation of provisional registration granted on 30/11/2022 under section 12AB is unjustified.”
In view of the above, the learned CIT(E) is directed to re–consider the matter denovo.
3 Nayi Suvidha Foundation ITA no.224/Nag./2024
In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 05/02/2025
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026