M/S SHUBH SHARE BROKING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O..,WARD-5(3), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with a specific condition. The appeal would be restored if the assessee's application under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' is not approved by the authorities.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. The assessee informed the tribunal that they have applied for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' and requested an adjournment or protection for the appeal to be restored if the scheme application is rejected.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request for an adjournment or conditional withdrawal of the appeal due to their application under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Hon’ble & Sri Aby T. Varkey, Hon’ble
order : August 19th, 2020 ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :- This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 10, Kolkata, (hereinafter the “ld.CIT(A)”), passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’), dt. 24/12/2019 for the Assessment Year 2012-13.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee is availing the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme” and has filed an application in this regard. He wanted an adjournment or in the alternative pleaded for protection that if its application under the scheme is rejected by the authorities, the appeal may be restored. He submitted that if such an assurance is recorded in the order, he would withdraw this appeal before the Tribunal. The ld. D/R had no objection.
After hearing rival contentions, we dismiss this appeal as withdrawn with the condition that the same shall be restored in case the authorities do not approve the application filed by the assessee for resolution of the dispute under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme”.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Kolkata, the 19th day of August, 2020.
Sd/- Sd/- [Aby T. Varkey] [J. Sudhakar Reddy] Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated : 19.08.2020 {SC SPS}
Assessment Years: 2012-13 M/s. Shubh Share Broking Pvt. Ltd. Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. M/s. Shubh Share Broking Pvt. Ltd M/s. Shubh Share Broking Pvt. Ltd Suite No. 521 Tobacco House 1, Old Court House Corner Lalbazar Kolkata – 700 001
2. Income Tax Officer, Ward – – 5(3), Kolkata 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata. 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026