SMT.LILA DEVI GOURISARIA,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CC-2(3), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal, subject to restoration if the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme approval is not granted. The appeal was treated as dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) confirming the penalty imposed by the AO under Section 271AAB. The assessee subsequently filed a declaration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM]
ORDER Shri A. T. Varkey, JM This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-20, Kolkata dated 31-01-2020 for the assessment year 2013-14 confirming the action of the AO u/s. 271AAB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).
At the outset, the Ld. AR for the assessee Smt. Sikha Agarwal submitted that the assessee has submitted form for filing declaration and undertaking under sub-section (5) of section 4 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 on 19.08.2020 before the department and is awaiting the approval from the Ld. Pr. CIT. Since the assessee preferred to opt for the scheme Vivad Se Vishwas as announced by the Govt. of India and the assessee has filed the requisite form on 19.08.2020 and is awaiting approval from the Ld. Pr. CIT, we allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal subject to caveat that in case the department does not approve the assessee’s action then the appeal will be restored on an application filed by the assessee in accordance to law. Therefore, the appeal of assessee is treated to be dismissed as withdrawn.
Smt. Lila Devi Gourisaria., AY 2013-14
In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 271AAB
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1564/KOL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse Shoe… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1559/KOL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1558/KOL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1557/KOL/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1556/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026